Bullying/Harassment, by Gender and Grade Level

(change indicator)
Download & Other Tools
Location: (hide)

59 selected

Year(s): (edit)

2017-2019

Grade Level: (edit)

All

Gender: (edit)

All

Student Response: (edit)

All

Select All Counties
Alameda County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Alpine County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Amador County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Butte County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Calaveras County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Colusa County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Contra Costa County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Del Norte County
School Districts
Select All Districts
El Dorado County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Fresno County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Glenn County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Humboldt County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Imperial County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Inyo County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Kern County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Kings County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Lake County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Lassen County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Los Angeles County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Madera County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Marin County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Mariposa County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Mendocino County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Merced County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Modoc County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Mono County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Monterey County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Napa County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Nevada County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Orange County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Placer County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Plumas County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Riverside County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Sacramento County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Benito County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Bernardino County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Diego County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Francisco County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Joaquin County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Luis Obispo County
School Districts
Select All Districts
San Mateo County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Santa Barbara County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Santa Clara County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Santa Cruz County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Shasta County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Sierra County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Siskiyou County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Solano County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Sonoma County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Stanislaus County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Sutter County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Tehama County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Trinity County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Tulare County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Tuolumne County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Ventura County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Yolo County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Yuba County
School Districts
Select All Districts
Loading…
CaliforniaPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 738.5%61.5%32.6%67.4%
Grade 934.5%65.5%25.8%74.2%
Grade 1131.2%68.8%23.0%77.0%
Non-Traditional20.1%79.9%13.2%86.8%
Alameda CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.4%62.6%33.6%66.4%
Grade 934.8%65.2%29.2%70.8%
Grade 1130.3%69.7%23.3%76.7%
Non-Traditional25.7%74.3%16.1%83.9%
Alpine CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 9N/AN/AN/AN/A
Grade 11N/AN/AN/AN/A
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Amador CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 754.8%45.2%35.9%64.1%
Grade 944.6%55.4%32.5%67.5%
Grade 1150.2%49.8%28.8%71.2%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Butte CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 743.3%56.7%37.5%62.5%
Grade 939.1%60.9%28.2%71.8%
Grade 1112.9%87.1%28.8%71.2%
Non-Traditional40.6%59.4%23.2%76.8%
Calaveras CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 745.2%54.8%32.5%67.5%
Grade 943.8%56.2%32.7%67.3%
Grade 1135.3%64.7%27.7%72.3%
Non-Traditional44.7%55.3%17.6%82.4%
Colusa CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 727.1%72.9%32.3%67.7%
Grade 923.8%76.2%21.0%79.0%
Grade 1126.9%73.1%21.1%78.9%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Contra Costa CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.4%63.6%34.2%65.8%
Grade 934.2%65.8%28.3%71.7%
Grade 1131.1%68.9%24.2%75.8%
Non-Traditional26.5%73.5%20.1%79.9%
Del Norte CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 758.6%41.4%52.6%47.4%
Grade 932.5%67.5%34.3%65.7%
Grade 1132.6%67.4%43.7%56.3%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
El Dorado CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 740.2%59.8%34.6%65.4%
Grade 943.5%56.5%32.3%67.7%
Grade 1143.2%56.8%27.5%72.5%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Fresno CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 9SSSS
Grade 11SSSS
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Glenn CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 740.0%60.0%33.5%66.5%
Grade 943.7%56.3%26.4%73.6%
Grade 1121.5%78.5%18.2%81.8%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Humboldt CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 744.0%56.0%32.7%67.3%
Grade 941.2%58.8%26.4%73.6%
Grade 1130.9%69.1%22.6%77.4%
Non-Traditional20.9%79.1%20.7%79.3%
Imperial CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 734.9%65.1%30.2%69.8%
Grade 929.1%70.9%22.7%77.3%
Grade 1125.8%74.2%17.9%82.1%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Inyo CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.6%62.4%34.7%65.3%
Grade 949.7%50.3%31.8%68.2%
Grade 1127.8%72.2%31.8%68.2%
Non-Traditional29.0%71.0%17.0%83.0%
Kern CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 735.0%65.0%28.9%71.1%
Grade 931.9%68.1%22.5%77.5%
Grade 1128.0%72.0%19.9%80.1%
Non-Traditional29.3%70.7%17.5%82.5%
Kings CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 927.1%72.9%19.5%80.5%
Grade 1136.3%63.7%25.7%74.3%
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Lake CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 750.4%49.6%41.6%58.4%
Grade 942.6%57.4%31.0%69.0%
Grade 1141.1%58.9%23.5%76.5%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Lassen CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 754.8%45.2%33.5%66.5%
Grade 945.6%54.4%25.5%74.5%
Grade 1134.6%65.4%31.3%68.7%
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Los Angeles CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.1%63.9%29.4%70.6%
Grade 928.4%71.6%23.7%76.3%
Grade 1127.9%72.1%20.2%79.8%
Non-Traditional19.0%81.0%11.6%88.4%
Madera CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 9SSSS
Grade 11SSSS
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Marin CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.1%63.9%34.0%66.0%
Grade 937.9%62.1%33.1%66.9%
Grade 1128.9%71.1%23.6%76.4%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Mariposa CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 733.3%66.7%29.5%70.5%
Grade 941.9%58.1%27.2%72.8%
Grade 1150.2%49.8%25.2%74.8%
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Mendocino CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 743.5%56.5%44.4%55.6%
Grade 941.5%58.5%29.0%71.0%
Grade 1120.0%80.0%26.9%73.1%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Merced CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 733.2%66.8%28.1%71.9%
Grade 934.1%65.9%25.3%74.7%
Grade 1130.5%69.5%21.3%78.7%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Modoc CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.7%62.3%58.3%41.7%
Grade 952.0%48.0%19.9%80.1%
Grade 1134.7%65.3%26.4%73.6%
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Mono CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 747.3%52.7%30.6%69.4%
Grade 943.6%56.4%23.2%76.8%
Grade 1124.4%75.6%29.5%70.5%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Monterey CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 730.4%69.6%23.4%76.6%
Grade 926.7%73.3%19.9%80.1%
Grade 1117.2%82.8%35.8%64.2%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Napa CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.7%62.3%31.7%68.3%
Grade 934.1%65.9%25.3%74.7%
Grade 1129.9%70.1%22.0%78.0%
Non-Traditional25.7%74.3%9.5%90.5%
Nevada CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 743.7%56.3%36.6%63.4%
Grade 949.0%51.0%34.4%65.6%
Grade 1137.5%62.5%32.3%67.7%
Non-Traditional30.0%70.0%18.0%82.0%
Orange CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 734.3%65.7%30.6%69.4%
Grade 931.7%68.3%26.5%73.5%
Grade 1130.1%69.9%22.8%77.2%
Non-Traditional20.5%79.5%17.4%82.6%
Placer CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 740.6%59.4%36.3%63.7%
Grade 938.4%61.6%28.0%72.0%
Grade 1134.6%65.4%23.8%76.2%
Non-Traditional33.9%66.1%22.8%77.2%
Plumas CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 740.1%59.9%28.0%72.0%
Grade 965.0%35.0%34.3%65.7%
Grade 1145.0%55.0%21.3%78.7%
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Riverside CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.4%63.6%30.0%70.0%
Grade 934.9%65.1%26.0%74.0%
Grade 1131.1%68.9%22.3%77.7%
Non-Traditional19.5%80.5%13.6%86.4%
Sacramento CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 741.0%59.0%35.4%64.6%
Grade 937.3%62.7%28.6%71.4%
Grade 1132.5%67.5%24.8%75.2%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
San Benito CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.2%63.8%38.6%61.4%
Grade 935.9%64.1%18.0%82.0%
Grade 1132.4%67.6%22.2%77.8%
Non-Traditional10.3%89.7%10.7%89.3%
San Bernardino CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 9SSSS
Grade 11SSSS
Non-TraditionalSSSS
San Diego CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.9%62.1%32.9%67.1%
Grade 933.9%66.1%27.0%73.0%
Grade 1131.5%68.5%22.8%77.2%
Non-Traditional25.4%74.6%17.4%82.6%
San Francisco CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 735.4%64.6%30.2%69.8%
Grade 920.8%79.2%19.6%80.4%
Grade 1122.3%77.7%25.9%74.1%
Non-Traditional28.5%71.5%12.5%87.5%
San Joaquin CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 740.8%59.2%31.7%68.3%
Grade 935.5%64.5%24.6%75.4%
Grade 1124.5%75.5%19.7%80.3%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
San Luis Obispo CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.3%63.7%31.9%68.1%
Grade 938.5%61.5%27.7%72.3%
Grade 1137.1%62.9%29.4%70.6%
Non-Traditional46.8%53.2%11.5%88.5%
San Mateo CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.6%63.4%34.0%66.0%
Grade 937.4%62.6%30.2%69.8%
Grade 1134.3%65.7%26.3%73.7%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Santa Barbara CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 732.4%67.6%27.7%72.3%
Grade 929.3%70.7%21.3%78.7%
Grade 1127.2%72.8%19.1%80.9%
Non-Traditional15.6%84.4%7.9%92.1%
Santa Clara CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 9SSSS
Grade 11SSSS
Non-Traditional7.8%92.2%9.1%90.9%
Santa Cruz CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.7%63.3%31.2%68.8%
Grade 930.3%69.7%23.5%76.5%
Grade 1127.5%72.5%19.2%80.8%
Non-Traditional18.4%81.6%12.0%88.0%
Shasta CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 949.3%50.7%34.1%65.9%
Grade 1138.4%61.6%27.3%72.7%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Sierra CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7N/AN/AN/AN/A
Grade 9N/AN/AN/AN/A
Grade 11N/AN/AN/AN/A
Non-TraditionalN/AN/AN/AN/A
Siskiyou CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 748.3%51.7%39.6%60.4%
Grade 947.2%52.8%27.9%72.1%
Grade 1134.7%65.3%22.7%77.3%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Solano CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 742.3%57.7%37.0%63.0%
Grade 936.3%63.7%28.3%71.7%
Grade 1131.9%68.1%23.0%77.0%
Non-Traditional27.7%72.3%21.8%78.2%
Sonoma CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.6%62.4%29.9%70.1%
Grade 938.7%61.3%27.4%72.6%
Grade 1129.9%70.1%22.3%77.7%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Stanislaus CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 735.1%64.9%31.0%69.0%
Grade 936.1%63.9%22.0%78.0%
Grade 1128.4%71.6%21.0%79.0%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Sutter CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 743.8%56.2%39.4%60.6%
Grade 9SSSS
Grade 11SSSS
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Tehama CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 744.0%56.0%34.6%65.4%
Grade 934.0%66.0%30.6%69.4%
Grade 1133.9%66.1%21.6%78.4%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Trinity CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.3%62.7%29.4%70.6%
Grade 942.9%57.1%30.4%69.6%
Grade 1124.9%75.1%33.1%66.9%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Tulare CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 7SSSS
Grade 9SSSS
Grade 11SSSS
Non-TraditionalSSSS
Tuolumne CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 752.1%47.9%37.5%62.5%
Grade 947.3%52.7%32.7%67.3%
Grade 1135.6%64.4%27.0%73.0%
Non-Traditional36.1%63.9%24.2%75.8%
Ventura CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 736.6%63.4%32.2%67.8%
Grade 931.0%69.0%24.5%75.5%
Grade 1128.2%71.8%22.7%77.3%
Non-Traditional43.8%56.2%33.6%66.4%
Yolo CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 737.9%62.1%31.5%68.5%
Grade 938.2%61.8%26.8%73.2%
Grade 1131.3%68.7%24.6%75.4%
Non-Traditional26.0%74.0%20.5%79.5%
Yuba CountyPercent
FemaleMale
Grade LevelSomeNoneSomeNone
Grade 745.7%54.3%34.7%65.3%
Grade 943.8%56.2%26.7%73.3%
Grade 1137.2%62.8%27.5%72.5%
Non-TraditionalSSSS
(Return to top)

Learn More About Bullying and Harassment at School

Measures of Bullying and Harassment at School on Kidsdata.org
On kidsdata.org, measures of bullying and harassment at school come from:
Data based on student reports come from the California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) and are available by grade level (7, 9, 11, and/or non-traditional), gender, level of school connectedness,* parent education level, and sexual orientation.

State-level CHKS estimates, although derived from the Biennial State CHKS, may differ from data published in Biennial State CHKS reports due to differences in grade-level classification of students in continuation high schools.

*Levels of school connectedness are based on a scale created from responses to five questions about feeling safe, close to people, and a part of school, being happy at school, and about teachers treating students fairly.
Bullying and Harassment at School
Children's Emotional Health
Pupil Support Services
School Climate
School Attendance and Discipline
School Safety
Youth Suicide and Self-Inflicted Injury
Why This Topic Is Important
Bullying is considered a significant public health problem (1, 2). National estimates indicate that between 20 and 30 percent of children and youth are bullied at school each year, with certain vulnerable groups at even higher risk, including students with disabilities and LGBTQ youth (1, 2). This aggressive behavior, which may be physical, verbal, or social—and may occur in person or online—can have long-term harmful effects (1, 2). In addition to the risk of physical injury, victims of bullying are at risk for depression, anxiety, suicidal behavior, physical health problems, substance abuse into adulthood, low academic achievement, and poor social and school adjustment (1, 2).

Any involvement in bullying, whether as a bully, victim, or witness, is associated with negative outcomes (1, 2). Youth who bully others are more likely to experience depression and engage in delinquent and suicidal behavior than non-bullies, and those who report being both a bully and a victim are at even higher risk for suicidal behavior (1, 2). Further, youth who only witness bullying are more likely to report feelings of helplessness and other negative feelings than those who have not witnessed bullying (1, 2). Even the fear of being bullied or harassed may disrupt a child's ability to excel in school and life (2).
For more information on bullying and harassment at school see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. National Academies Press. Retrieved from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23482/preventing-bullying-through-science-policy-and-practice

2.  National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2014). The relationship between bullying and suicide: What we know and what it means for schools. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/yv/bullying-suicide-translation-final-a.pdf
How Children Are Faring
According to a 2017-2019 survey of California students, more than one in four youth in grades 7, 9, and 11 had been bullied or harassed at school in the previous year, and more than one in five had been cyberbullied by other students. During the same period, school staff reports that bullying and harassment among students was a moderate or severe problem ranged from 20% of responses from elementary school staff to 44% of middle school staff reports, down from 28% and 52%, respectively, in 2011-2013. In each grade level, estimates of bullying and cyberbullying tend to be higher among girls than among boys. Across all types of bullying and harassment, gay, lesbian, and bisexual students and those with low levels of school connectedness are more likely to be victimized than their straight and more connected peers.

When students are bullied or harassed at school, it is most often for reasons of bias (related to disabilities, gender, race/ethnicity or national origin, religion, or sexual orientation). In 2017-2019, an estimated 26% of California 7th graders, 23% of 9th graders, 22% of 11th graders, and 13% of non-traditional students had been bullied or harassed in the previous year for bias-related reasons. The prevalence of bias-related bullying and harassment varies widely depending on region, reason for bias, and group affected. For example, Asian youth statewide were more than twice as likely to have been bullied or harassed for reasons related to their race/ethnicity or national origin when compared with their Hispanic/Latino counterparts, according to 2017-2019 estimates. Among California youth identifying as gay, lesbian, and bisexual, almost half (44%) had been bullied or harassed because they were, or were thought to be, gay or lesbian, with county-level percentages ranging from 17% to more than 60% across regions with data.
Policy Implications
Bullying and harassment at school have come under closer scrutiny by schools and policymakers in recent years (1, 2). Bullying is pervasive in schools nationwide and can have lasting harmful consequences on child health and well being (1, 2, 3). Although any student can be a victim, certain groups are at higher risk for being bullied or harassed, such as LGBTQ youth and students with disabilities (1, 2).

California has enacted laws to address bullying and cyberbullying, and state and federal policies provide guidance on effective school discipline strategies (4, 5). In particular, schools are required to use alternatives to suspensions and expulsions, as overuse of these practices has not resulted in safer schools or reduced victimization (3, 4). State and federal policies also encourage schools to teach students social and behavioral skills and to create positive, supportive school environments (4). Comprehensive strategies that focus on building protective factors (e.g., social skills, caring relationships with adults, student connectedness to school, etc.) and addressing bullying in tandem with other negative behaviors, such as substance use and violence, are most likely to succeed (1, 3, 6).

Policy and program options that could prevent and address bullying/harassment at school include:
  • Incorporating anti-bullying efforts into comprehensive, well-coordinated school-wide systems supporting student needs and creating positive school climates, as supportive school atmospheres are linked to lower bullying rates and other positive outcomes (1, 3, 6)
  • Engaging all school stakeholders—leaders, teachers, students, families, community members, and others—to develop and disseminate shared anti-bullying mission statements, codes of conduct, school policies, and bullying reporting systems (3, 6, 7)
  • Providing training for staff (e.g., teachers, coaches, counselors, nurses, administrators, etc.), students, parents, and others on how to deal with bullying incidents, focusing in particular on empowering bystanders to prevent bullying (3, 6)
  • Following state and federal law, implementing prevention-oriented school discipline policies that are clear, fair, consistent, and promote a positive learning environment; such policies should be based on a tiered system of appropriate responses to misconduct that keep students in school when possible, and should include clear, equitable classroom behavior management practices (4, 8)
  • Ensuring that school policies and practices are responsive to diverse cultural norms and focus on reducing harassment of vulnerable populations, including youth with disabilities and LGBTQ youth; this may involve staff training, student support, information sharing, and public position statements (3, 6)
  • Ensuring that anti-bullying efforts address the wide array of settings where incidents may occur, e.g., hallways, restrooms, buses, routes to and from school, and online (1, 3, 7)
  • Providing opportunities for students to develop social and behavioral skills (such as self-regulation, problem solving, relationship building, and decision making) and to build connections with adults that foster supportive relationships and high expectations (1, 3, 6)
  • Encouraging social media companies to publish anti-bullying policies and to implement, evaluate, and strengthen methods of preventing and addressing bullying online (1)
Find more policy ideas and information at the California Department of Education's School Health Office and the U.S. government's StopBullying.gov. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under School Climate, Pupil Support Services, and School Attendance and Discipline.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. National Academies Press. Retrieved from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23482/preventing-bullying-through-science-policy-and-practice

2.  National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2014). The relationship between bullying and suicide: What we know and what it means for schools. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/yv/bullying-suicide-translation-final-a.pdf

3.  American Educational Research Association. (2013). Prevention of bullying in schools, colleges, and universities: Research report and recommendations. Retrieved from: https://www.aera.net/Publications/Books/Prevention-of-Bullying

4.  Public Counsel. (n.d.). Fix School Discipline: Toolkit for educators. Retrieved from: http://www.fixschooldiscipline.org/educator-toolkit

5.  Cyberbullying Research Center. (n.d.). Bullying laws in California. Retrieved from: https://cyberbullying.org/bullying-laws/california

6.  David-Ferdon, C., & Simon, T. R. (2014). Preventing youth violence: Opportunities for action. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED556347

7.  StopBullying.gov. (2021). How to prevent bullying. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: https://www.stopbullying.gov/prevention/how-to-prevent-bullying

8.  Morgan, E., et al. (2014). The school discipline consensus report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system. Council of State Governments Justice Center. Retrieved from: https://csgjusticecenter.org/publications/school-discipline
Websites with Related Information
Key Reports and Research
County/Regional Reports
More Data Sources For Bullying and Harassment at School